Case Details

• Civil Appeal No.: 3119/2018

• Diary No.: 10224/2018

• Court: Supreme Court of India (Court No. 3, Section XII-A)

• Bench: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Manmohan (Partial Court Working Days Bench)

• Type of Proceeding: Civil Appeal

Key Proceedings

1. Hearing Date: 11-Jun-2025

2. Appearances:
   Appellant (G. Srinivas Rao):
   Represented by M/s. Venkat Palwai Law Associates, AOR (Non-Present).
   Respondents (Sadula Narsaiah & Ors.): Absent.

3. Court’s Order:
   Non-Appearance: Neither party appeared for the hearing.
   Adjournment: The matter was listed after partial court working days (next available session).

Judgment Research Format

1. Case Citation

G. Srinivas Rao vs. Sadula Narsaiah & Ors., Civil Appeal No. 3119/2018 (Supreme Court of India, Order dated 11-Jun-2025).

2. Issues Raised

• Procedural Default: Non-appearance of both parties, delaying adjudication of the appeal.

• Substantive Issue: The merits of the civil appeal (likely involving property, contract, or civil rights disputes) remain unaddressed.

3. Court’s Direction

• Adjournment: The matter was deferred to the next available hearing date post partial court working days.

4. Legal Significance

• The order underscores the Court’s adherence to procedural discipline—proceedings cannot advance without party participation.

• Repeated non-appearance may lead to dismissal for non-prosecution under Order XLI, Rule 17 of the CPC.

5. Next Steps

• Parties must ensure representation in the next hearing to avoid adverse orders.

• The Registry may issue fresh notices if non-appearance persists.

Conclusion

The Supreme Court’s order reflects a routine adjournment due to non-appearance, preserving judicial time while allowing parties another opportunity to present their case. The appeal’s future hinges on the parties’ proactive engagement.