Lawcurb
Summary and Analysis of Indira Laul v. Union of India & Ors. – W.P.(C) No. 585/2025
Case Details:
Diary Number: 32942/2025
Court: Supreme Court of India
Bench: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ujjal Bhuyan & Hon’ble Mr. Justice Manmohan
Date of Hearing: 17-Jun-2025
Petitioner: Indira Laul
Respondents: Union of India & Others
Counsel for Petitioner: Mr. P.B. Suresh (Sr. Adv.), Mr. Konark Tyagi (AOR), Mr. Karthik Jayashankar (Adv.)
Counsel for Respondents: Not present/not mentioned
Interlocutory Applications (IAs):
IA No. 146239/2025: Application for ex-parte stay (details not specified in the extract).
IA No. 146243/2025: Application for exemption from filing official translations.
Proceedings and Order:
The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. P.B. Suresh, sought permission to withdraw the writ petition to pursue alternative legal remedies.
The Supreme Court granted the request and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Key Observations:
The order does not disclose the subject matter of the writ petition or the reasons for withdrawal.
The dismissal is procedural, allowing the petitioner to explore other legal avenues.
Judgment :
Citation: Indira Laul v. Union of India & Ors., W.P.(C) No. 585/2025, Order dated 17-Jun-2025 (SC).
Held:
The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn upon the petitioner’s request.
No adjudication on merits; liberty granted to avail other remedies under law.
Conclusion:
The order reflects the Supreme Court’s adherence to procedural flexibility, permitting litigants to withdraw cases to pursue alternative reliefs without prejudice.