Case Details

• Civil Appeal No.: 8742/2017

• Diary No.: 16558/2011

• Court: Supreme Court of India (Court No. 3, Section III-A)

• Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manmohan (Partial Court Working Days Bench)

• Type of Proceeding: Civil Appeal

Key Proceedings

1. Hearing Date: 11-Jun-2025

2. Appearances:
   Appellant (Kallu Singh):
   AOR Mr. Prashant Chaudhary
   Advocates Mr. Praveen Swarup, Mr. Kanishk Chaudhary, Mr. Ravi Kumar, and others (total 11 counsel listed)
   Respondents (D.D.C. & Ors.): Not represented in this hearing

3. Court's Order:
   Adjournment Granted: The matter was adjourned based on a request circulated by the appellant's counsel.
   Next Listing: To be heard after partial court working days (specific date not mentioned).

Judgment Research Format

1. Case Citation

Kallu Singh vs. D.D.C. & Ors., Civil Appeal No. 8742/2017 (Supreme Court of India, Order dated 11-Jun-2025).

2. Issues Raised

• The substantive issues in the civil appeal were not addressed due to the adjournment.

• Procedural Issue: Adjournment sought by appellant's counsel (reason not specified in order).

3. Court's Direction

• Adjournment: Granted to accommodate appellant's request.

• Future Listing: Matter to be listed after partial court working days.

4. Legal Significance

• The large number of counsel for appellant (11) suggests either case complexity or multiple interested parties.

• The adjournment reflects court's practice of accommodating counsel requests while managing heavy caseloads.

5. Next Steps

• The appeal will be heard on next listing date, when substantive issues may be addressed.

Conclusion

The Supreme Court's brief order grants routine adjournment, preserving the appellant's right to proper representation. The case appears to involve significant legal representation, indicating potential complexity.