Case Details:

• Petition No.: Special Leave Petition (Civil) Diary No. 25393/2025

• Arising From: Impugned judgment dated 14-12-2023 in MAC No. 962/2017 passed by the Chhattisgarh High Court at Bilaspur

• Parties:
  Petitioner: Niraj Das Manikpuri
  Respondents: Rajkumar Sahu & Ors.

Key Proceedings:

1. Hearing Date: 20-06-2025

2. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ujjal Bhuyan & Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manmohan (Partial Court Working Days Bench)

3. Representation:
   For Petitioner: Mr. Kaustubh Shukla (AOR)
   For Respondents: Not represented during hearing

Court's Order:

1. Delay Condoned: Delay in filing the petition was condoned

2. Notice Issued: Notice to respondents made returnable on 12.09.2025

Key Legal Points:

1. The case arises from a Motor Accident Claim (MAC), indicating it involves compensation matters under the Motor Vehicles Act

2. The condonation of delay suggests the petitioner showed sufficient cause for the late filing

3. The issuance of notice indicates the Court found prima facie merit to examine the matter

Judgment Research Format

AspectDetailsCase TitleNiraj Das Manikpuri vs. Rajkumar Sahu & Ors.JurisdictionSupreme Court of India (Civil - Motor Accident Claim Matter)Lower Court OrderChhattisgarh High Court's order dated 14-12-2023 in MAC No. 962/2017Supreme Court ActionCondoned delay; issued notice returnable on 12.09.2025Legal Principle1. Delay condonable for sufficient cause
2. Notice indicates prima facie considerationNext Date12.09.2025

Significant Observations:

1. The matter involves compensation claims, likely concerning accident liability or quantum

2. The original claim dates back to 2017, indicating a long-pending litigation

3. The three-month period for return of notice allows adequate time for respondent's response.