Case Title: Syndicate Bank vs. M/s Mullangie Spintex Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
Civil Appeal No.: 6396/2016
Diary No.: 629/2011
Date of Hearing: 11th June 2025
Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra & Hon’ble Mr. Justice Manmohan

Key Proceedings and Orders

1. Nature of Appeal:
   Civil Appeal filed by Syndicate Bank (Appellant) against M/s Mullangie Spintex Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. (Respondents), likely involving a dispute related to banking, loans, or recovery proceedings.

2. Representation:
   Appellant (Syndicate Bank):
   Mr. Biju Thankappen, AOR
   Mr. Ravi Kumar, Adv.
   Respondents (M/s Mullangie Spintex Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.):
   Mr. Abhishek, AOR

3. Court’s Decision:
   The appellant’s counsel sought and was granted three weeks’ time to file an amended cause title (likely to correct or update party details).
   The matter was adjourned and directed to be listed after three weeks.

Judgment Research Format

Case Citation: Syndicate Bank vs. M/s Mullangie Spintex Pvt. Ltd. & Ors., Civil Appeal No. 6396/2016 (Supreme Court of India).

Background:

• The appeal arises from a civil dispute, possibly involving financial transactions, loan recovery, or contractual obligations between Syndicate Bank and M/s Mullangie Spintex Pvt. Ltd. The exact nature of the impugned judgment is not detailed in the excerpt.

Legal Issues:

1. Procedural Compliance: Amendment of the cause title to ensure accurate representation of parties.

2. Adjournment: Granting time to rectify procedural formalities before proceeding with substantive arguments.

Court’s Observations:

• The Court allowed the appellant’s request for time to amend the cause title, emphasizing the importance of correct party representation in legal proceedings.

• The adjournment reflects the Court’s flexibility in procedural matters to ensure fairness and completeness of records.

Outcome:

• Matter adjourned for three weeks to allow filing of the amended cause title.

• Next hearing to be scheduled post-compliance.

Significance:

• Highlights the judiciary’s emphasis on procedural accuracy in civil appeals, particularly in cases involving financial institutions.

• Demonstrates the balance between efficiency and fairness by allowing reasonable time for corrections.

Conclusion:
The order is interim and procedural, ensuring that the appeal proceeds with accurate documentation. The substantive issues will be addressed after compliance with the amendment directive.