Synopsis

The applicant was accused of forcibly entering a house with weapons and assaulting the complainant and his family members, causing grievous injuries. He was in custody since 21.05.2025. The trial court had rejected his bail. The High Court granted bail, considering: (i) the charge sheet had been filed, (ii) co-accused persons had been granted interim anticipatory bail, (iii) the applicant had no criminal antecedents, and (iv) the trial was likely to take time. The court did not express any opinion on the merits of the case.

Court: High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital

Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra (Single Judge)

Date of Judgment: 29th April 2026

Citation: BA1/932/2025 (2026:UHC:3267)

Core Law: Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 – Section 483 (regular bail); Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023 – Sections 109, 115(2), 190, 191(2), 191(3), 333, 351(3), 352

1. Heading of the judgment

High court of uttarakhand at nainital

Ba1/932 of 2025

Aas mohammad alias mangta (applicant) vs. State of uttarakhand (respondent)

Coram: hon’ble mr. justice alok mahra

Date: 29th april, 2026

2. Legal framework

Major

... Upgrade to a Premium Plan to view the full judgment.