.jpeg){kind=small}
Case Analysis President, Indian Olympic Association & Anr vs S K Mendiratta & Ors 2026 DHC 3469-DB
Synopsis
The review petitioner (an Indian Olympic Association affiliated body) sought review of a Division Bench judgment dated 23rd March 2026, which had modified an earlier Single Judge order. The review petitioner contended that the judgment erroneously recorded that it was not a recognised National Sports Federation. The court dismissed the review petition, holding that: (i) the National Sports Development Code, 2011 (and now the 2025 Act) governs recognition of National Sports Federations; (ii) affiliation with the Indian Olympic Association (IOA) does not equate to recognition as a National Sports Federation; (iii) the review petitioner failed to point out any error apparent on the face of the record; (iv) the review petition was misconceived. Costs of Rs.10,000/- were imposed.
Court: High Court of Delhi
Coram: Honourable the Chief Justice (Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya) and Honourable Mr. Justice Tejas Karia
Date of Judgment: 24th April 2026
Citation: Review Petition (Civil) No. ___ of 2026 arising out of W.P.(C) No. 3418/2025 (unreported)
Core Law: Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 – Section 114, Order 47 Rule 1 (review); National Sports Development Code of India, 2011; National Sports Governance Act, 2025; Review jurisdiction – error apparent on face of record
2. Legal Framework
Major laws and provisions involved
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 – Section 114 (review of judgments), Order 47 Rule 1 (grounds for review: discovery of new evidence, mistake or error apparent on face of record, any other sufficient reason)
National Sports Development Code of India, 2011 – Clause 8, Annexure‑2 (conditions and procedure for recognition as a National Sports Federation)
National Sports Governance Act, 2025 – governs recognition of sports bodies after its enforcement (referred to in judgment)
Key legal principles applied
Review jurisdiction – limited scope: A review is not an appeal in disguise. The court can review its judgment only if there is an error apparent on the face of the record – an error that is manifest and does not require
... Upgrade to a Premium Plan to view the full judgment.