This judgment is about the Delhi High Court setting aside an arbitral award because the arbitrator gave a limited manufacturing go-ahead for stubs/templates, treated it as clearance for towers, and ignored contradictory vital evidence.

Case Snapshot

• Case Name: Flowmore Limited v. M/s Skipper Limited

• Citation / Neutral Citation: FAO(OS) (COMM) 31/2023; CNR No. DLHC010905742023; 2026:DHC:9476-DB

• High Court: High Court of Delhi at New Delhi

• Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Avneesh Jhingan and Hon'ble Ms. Justice Shail Jain

• Date of Judgment: 28.10.2026

• Area of Law: Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 — Sections 34 and 37

Judgment Headline

Delhi High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award for Contradictory Findings and Ignoring Vital Evidence

The Judgment in One Line

The Delhi High Court allowed a Section 37 appeal, set aside an ₹8.15 crore arbitral award, and held that contradictory findings and disregard of vital contrac

... Upgrade to a Premium Plan to view the full judgment.