Delhi High Court Condoned 27-Day Delay in Filing Section 34 Petition Under Arbitration Act

Case Snapshot

Case Name: Inox Wind Limited & Anr. v. Jasdan Energy Private Limited & Anr.

Citation / Neutral Citation: 2026:DHC:7382

High Court: High Court of Delhi

Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Avneesh Jhingan

Date of Judgment: 2nd September, 2026

Area of Law: Arbitration Law, Limitation, Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Section 33

Judgment Headline

Court condones 27-day delay in filing Section 34 petition due to pending Section 33 application.

The Judgment in One Line

Delhi High Court condones 27-day delay in filing Section 34 petition, holding pending Section 33 application constituted sufficient cause.

Why This Judgment Matters

This judgment clarifies the interplay between applications under Section 33 and limitation for Section 34 petitions. It establishes that filing a Section 33 application within the prescribed period and awaiting its disposal constitutes sufficient cause for condoning a delay of up to 30 days under Section 34(3). The ruling provides guidance on when courts will exercise discretion to condone delay, particularly where the party has acted

... Upgrade to a Premium Plan to view the full judgment.