Synopsis

The petitioner filed a contempt petition alleging wilful disobedience of the orders passed by the High Court in a previous writ petition (W.P.(C) 13745/2024). In the earlier writ petition, the court had recorded that the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) had passed sealing orders and a vacation notice regarding unauthorised construction, and had disposed of the writ petition on the basis of MCD’s statement that any regularisation application would be decided within four weeks, and thereafter demolition action would follow. Subsequently, the owner/occupier appealed to the Appellate Tribunal, MCD (ATMCD), which passed an interim order staying demolition. The petitioner alleged that MCD was deliberately not taking action in collusion with the owner. The High Court, without finding contempt, directed the ATMCD to expedite the proceedings (preferably within six months) and directed MCD to pursue the matter diligently. The contempt petition was disposed of accordingly.

1. Heading of the judgment

High court of delhi

Cont.cas(c) 437/2025

Lalit kumar (petitioner) vs. Gyanesh bharti, the commissioner municipal corporation of delhi and ors. (respondents)

Coram: hon’ble mr. justice sachin datta

Date of decision: 4th may, 2026

2. Legal framework

Major laws and provisions involved:

Constitution of india, 1950 – article 226 (writ jurisdiction), article 215 (contempt of court)

Contempt of courts act, 1971 – section 2(b) (definition of civil contempt – wilful disobedience of judgment, decree, direction, order or writ of a court), section 12 (punishment for contempt)

Municipal corporation of delhi act, 1957 – provisions relating to unauthorised construction and appeals to appellate tribunal

Subject matter of the judgment:

Whether the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) can be held in contempt for allegedly failing to implement demolition orders when a stay order was granted by the Appellate Tribunal, MCD, and whether the High Court should direct expeditious d

... Upgrade to a Premium Plan to view the full judgment.