This judgment is about the Delhi High Court declining writ jurisdiction over GST adjudication orders despite allegations of a non-speaking Section 74 notice and penalty imposed without a proposal, relegating the petitioner to the statutory appeal.

Case Snapshot

• Case Name: Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders v. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods and Services Tax & Anr.

• Citation / Neutral Citation: W.P.(C) 50/2026 and W.P.(C) 2528/2026; CNR Nos. DLHC011076182025 and DLHC011099162025; 2026:DHC:9479-DB

• High Court: High Court of Delhi at New Delhi

• Bench: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Anil Kshetarpal and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Bharat Parashar

• Date of Judgment: 28.10.2026

• Area of Law: Goods and Services Tax; Writ Jurisdiction under Article 226; Alternative Statutory Remedy

Judgment Headline

Delhi High Court Relegates GST Petitioner to Statutory Appeal, Refuses Writ Relief on Section 74 Notice

The Judgment in One Line

... Upgrade to a Premium Plan to view the full judgment.