Case Analysis N S J L Nidhi Ltd vs The Regional Director (Wr) Ministry Of Corporate Affair And Anr 2026 BHC-AS 22465
Synopsis
A nidhi company filed returns of allotment (Form PAS-3) but did not separately certify the attached list of allottees as required under Rule 12(2) of the Allotment Rules, although the affirmation clause in Form PAS-3 vouched for its correctness. The adjudicating officer imposed the maximum penalty of ₹1 lakh per default on the company and on each director separately, multiplying the penalty by the number of directors. The bombay high court held that section 39(5) is neither a fixed penalty provision nor a minimum penalty provision. Relying on the supreme court’s three-judge bench decision in bhavesh pabari (interpreting identically worded section 15-a of the sebi act), the court ruled that the adjudicating officer has discretion to consider aggravating and mitigating factors under rule 3(12) of the penalty rules. The impugned order was modified: the penalty was reduced to ₹1 lakh per default, payable jointly and severally by the company and all directors, instead of multiplied by the number of directors.
Court: High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Civil Appellate Jurisdiction
Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan (Single Judge)
Date of Judgment: 27th April 2026
Citation: Writ Petition No. 10782 of 2024 (unreported)
Core Law: Companies Act, 2013 – Section 39 (allotment of securities), Section 39(5) (penalty for default), Section 2(60) (officer who is in default); Companies (Adjudication of Penalties) Rules, 2014 – Rule 3(12); Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 – Section 15-A (cognate provision).
1. Heading of the judgment
High court of judicature at bombay civil appellate jurisdiction
Writ petition no. 10782 of 2024
N.s.j.l nidhi ltd throu. its rohit k bhamburdekar and ors. (petitioners) vs. The regional director (wr) ministry of corporate affair and anr. (respondents)
Coram: hon’ble mr. justice somasekhar sundaresan
Date: 27th april, 2026
2. Legal framework
Major laws and provisions involved:
Companies act, 2013 – section 39(4) (return of allotment), section 39(5) (penalty for default), section 2(60) (officer who is in default), section 454(3) (remedial measures), section 454a (repeat violation)
Companies (prospectus and allotment of securities) rules, 2014 – rule 12 (return of allotment – form pas-3 and certification of allottee list)
Companies (adjudication of penalties) rules, 2014 – rule 3(12) (factors for adjudicating quantum of penalty: size of company, nature of default, injury to public interest, disproportionate gain, loss caused, repetition)
Securities and exchange board of india act, 1992 – section 15-a (penalty for failure to furni
... Upgrade to a Premium Plan to view the full judgment.