top of page

Pinnacle Innovatory Services Private Limited vs Sh Raj Kumar Singhal

Delhi High Court Dismisses Petition, Upholds Closure of Right to File Written Statement Beyond 120-Day Limit


Case Snapshot

Case Name: Pinnacle Innovatory Services Private Limited v. Sh. Raj Kumar Singhal

Citation / Neutral Citation: CNR No. DLHC010309282026

High Court: High Court of Delhi

Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Digpaul

Date of Judgment: 15th September, 2026

Area of Law: Commercial Courts Act, 2015, CPC, Order VIII Rule 1, Service of Summons, Review


Judgment Headline

Right to file written statement closed beyond 120-day limit; service on email ID in MCA filings valid.


The Judgment in One Line

Delhi High Court dismisses petition, holding that service on email ID reflected in statutory filings is valid and the 120-day outer limit for written statement cannot be condoned.


Why This Judgment Matters

This judgment reinforces the mandatory nature of the 120-day outer limit for filing written statements under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015. It establishes that a corporate entity cannot disown an email ID reflected in


... Upgrade to a Premium Plan to view the full judgment.

🔒 Premium Legal Resource

This is a 20% curated summary of the judgment. Gain unrestricted access to our full database of expert case analyses, core legal frameworks, and downloadable analytical PDFs by upgrading to a Lawcurb membership. Join our legal network to unlock this entire record.

Copyright © 2026 Lawcurb.in

bottom of page