This judgment is about the Bombay High Court directing a dissenting society member to vacate her flat for redevelopment, holding that courts must grant mandatory interim injunctions against minority members who hold up projects and cause prejudice to the consenting majority.

Case Snapshot

• Case Name: Pritam Sadan Sahakari Gruharachana Sanstha Maryadit v. Jyotsna S. Rajopadhya

• Citation / Neutral Citation: Writ Petition No. 14139 of 2026; 2026:BHC-AS:45405

• High Court: High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Civil Appellate Jurisdiction)

• Bench: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep V. Marne

• Date of Judgment: 05.11.2026

• Area of Law: Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960; Redevelopment; Mandatory Temporary Injunction

Judgment Headline

Bombay High Court Orders Dissenting Member to Vacate Flat for Society Redevelopment

The Judgment in One Line

The Bom

... Upgrade to a Premium Plan to view the full judgment.