top of page

Ravindra Darshan Puri vs Matin Gafoor Momin

This judgment deals with whether a court can impose a condition of depositing 50% of arrears as a pre-condition for condoning delay in filing an appeal.


Case Snapshot

  • Case Name: Ravindra Darshan Puri v. Matin Gafoor Momin

  • Citation / Neutral Citation: 2026:BHC-AUG:4823

  • High Court: Bombay High Court, Bench at Aurangabad

  • Bench: Justice Manjusha A. Deshpande

  • Date of Judgment: October 12, 2026

  • Area of Law: Civil Procedure; Order XLI Rule 3A CPC; Section 5 Limitation Act; condonation of delay; pre-conditions


Judgment Headline

Bombay HC Sets Aside Condition to Deposit 50% Arrears for Condoning Delay in Appeal


The Judgment in One Line

Bombay High Court held that a court cannot impose a pre-condition of depositing 50% of arrears for condoning delay when no stay application has been filed.


... Upgrade to a Premium Plan to view the full judgment.

🔒 Premium Legal Resource

This is a 20% curated summary of the judgment. Gain unrestricted access to our full database of expert case analyses, core legal frameworks, and downloadable analytical PDFs by upgrading to a Lawcurb membership. Join our legal network to unlock this entire record.

Copyright © 2026 Lawcurb.in

bottom of page