This judgment is about the Bombay High Court dismissing an allottee's appeal against a condition of ₹38.18 crore deposit imposed by the Real Estate Appellate Tribunal, holding that the 10% cap on promoter advances under Section 13(1) RERA does not restrict the tribunal's discretionary power to impose conditions for interim relief.

Case Snapshot

• Case Name: Sachin Bajla v. Honest Shelters Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.

• Citation / Neutral Citation: Second Appeal No. 534 of 2024; 2026:BHC-AS:45353

• High Court: High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Civil Appellate Jurisdiction)

• Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep V. Marne

• Date of Judgment: 05.11.2026

• Area of Law: Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 — Sections 13, 44(3), 53 and 58; MOFA; Specific Relief Act — Section 16(c)

Judgment Headline

Bombay High Court Upholds ₹38 Crore Deposit Condition, Holds Section 13 RERA Cap Binds Promoter Not Tribunal

The Judgment in One Line

The Bombay High Court dismissed an allottee's app

... Upgrade to a Premium Plan to view the full judgment.