This judgment is about the Bombay High Court at Goa dismissing a criminal revision, holding that the statutory presumption under Section 139 of the NI Act is rebuttable, but the accused failed to raise a probable defence against an inflated cheque amount.

Case Snapshot

• Case Name: Sandip Harishchandra Devidas v. The Gokul Urban Co-operative Credit Society Ltd. & Anr.

• Citation / Neutral Citation: Criminal Revision Application No. 142 of 2026; 2026:BHC-GOA:2288

• High Court: High Court of Bombay at Goa

• Bench: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amit S. Jamsandekar

• Date of Judgment: 02.11.2026

• Area of Law: Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — Sections 138, 118(a), 139; Criminal Revision

Judgment Headline

... Upgrade to a Premium Plan to view the full judgment.