This judgment is about the Delhi High Court dismissing a Section 37 appeal, holding that the arbitral tribunal's rejection of counterclaims for outstanding payments was based on a plausible interpretation of the contract and did not warrant interference.

Case Snapshot

• Case Name: Viceroy Engineering v. Smiths Detection Vecon Systems Pvt. Ltd.

• Citation / Neutral Citation: FAO(OS) (COMM) 45/2026; 2026:DHC:9813-DB

• High Court: High Court of Delhi at New Delhi

• Bench: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Anil Kshetarpal and Hon’ble Ms. Justice Shail Jain

• Date of Judgment: 04.11.2026

• Area of Law: Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 — Sections 34 and 37; Contract Law; Evidence

Judgment Headline

Delhi High Court Upholds Rejection of Counterclaims, Defers to Arbitrator's Contractual Interpretation

The Judgment in One Line

The Delhi High Court dismissed a Section 37 appeal,

... Upgrade to a Premium Plan to view the full judgment.