Benefit of Doubt in Criminal Trial: Prosecution Lapses and Delay in FIR Transmission Lead to Acquittal

Case Snapshot

• Case Name: Deo Prasad and Anr. v. State of Uttar Pradesh

• Citation: 2026 INSC 707

• Bench: Justice Sandeep Mehta & Justice Vikram Mehta

• Date of Judgment: July 15, 2026

• Area of Law: Criminal Law, Murder, Evidence, FIR, Investigation

Judgment in Brief

The Supreme Court acquitted the accused-appellants in a 1977 murder case, holding that the prosecution had failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The Court found that the FIR was ante-timed and reached the Magistrate only two days after the incident, the dead body remained unattended throughout the night, the inquest and post-mortem were delayed without explanation, and there were material contradictions regarding the presence of eye-witnesses. The cumulative effect of these suspicious circumstances created a reasonable doubt about the prosecution's version, entitling the accused to the benefit of doubt. The conviction and sentence imposed by the Trial Court and affirmed by the High Court were set aside.

Relevant Facts

• On June 28, 1977, at about 4:30 p.m., the prosecution alleged that the accused-appellants, armed with 'kanta', 'ballam', and 'lathi', ambushed and assaulted Harihar Saran (deceased-victim) near village Kanchanpur, causing his death.

• The FIR was registered at about 7:10 p.m. on the same day at Police Station Colonelganj, District Gonda.

• The inquest proceedings were conducted on June 29, 1977 (the next day), and the post-mortem was conducted on June 30, 1977 (two days after the incident).

... Upgrade to a Premium Plan to view the full judgment.