top of page

Gopalakrishna Surapaneni vs Anuradha Surpaneni (Maiden) 2026 INSC 623

Legal Analysis: Gopalakrishna Surapaneni v. Anuradha Surpaneni (Maiden)

Citation: 2026 INSC 623

Court: Supreme Court of India

Bench: A Division Bench comprising Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah and Justice R. Mahadevan

Date of Decision: May 27, 2026

Nature of Judgment: Civil Appeal arising out of SLP (C) Nos. 34898-34899 of 2014 against the judgment of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad dated 26.09.2014 in FCA No. 16/2007 and FCA No. 22/2007.


Synopsis of the Judgment

The appellant-husband sought divorce from the respondent-wife, alleging harassment, loss of employment abroad, and long‑term separation since 2003. The Family Court dismissed the petition, and the High Court upheld the dismissal. The husband appealed to the Supreme Court. The parties had been living separately for over two decades. The wife opposed divorce vehemently, citing societal pressure, but could not offer any satisfactory explanation for reconciliation. The Supreme Court found that the marriage had irretrievably broken down and that forcing the relationship through judicial proceedings was neither possible nor desirable. Exercising power under Article 142 of the Constitution, the Court granted a decree of divorce on the condition that the husband pay Rs.60,00,000 (in addition to Rs.68,00,000 already deposited in the Court Registry) to the wife as a one‑time permanent settlement. The Court also recorded that the daughter’s rights qua the father’s estate and the husband’s share in the daughter’s marriage expenses would not be affected. A pending case (FCA No.93 of 2019) was quashed.


1. Basic Information of the Judgment

Case Title: Gopalakrishna Surapaneni v. Anuradha Surpaneni (Maiden)

Citation: 2026 INSC 623

Civil Appeal Nos.: 8212-8213 of 2026 (arising out of SLP (C) Nos. 34898-34899 of 2014)

Bench: Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah and Justice R. Mahadevan

Date of Decision: May 27, 2026

Court: Supreme Court of India (Civil Appellate Jurisdiction)

Impugned Order: Judgment and order dated 26.09.2014 of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad in FCA No. 16/2007 and FCA No. 22/2007, upholding the Family Court’s dismissal of the divorce petition.


2. Legal Framework

Major Laws and Provisions Involved

  • Constitution of India, 1950 – Article 142 (power of Supreme Court to do complete justice – invoked to grant divorce on ground of irretrievable breakdown of marriage even where no specific statutory provision exists).

  • Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 – Section 13 (grounds for divorce – cruelty, desertion, etc.). The Court did not find the statutory grounds fully proved but invoked Article 142 to grant divorce on irretrievable breakdown.


... Upgrade to a Premium Plan to view the full judgment.

🔒 Premium Legal Resource

This is a 20% curated summary of the judgment. Gain unrestricted access to our full database of expert case analyses, core legal frameworks, and downloadable analytical PDFs by upgrading to a Lawcurb membership. Join our legal network to unlock this entire record.

Copyright © 2026 Lawcurb.in

bottom of page