Supreme Court Acquits in Kidnapping-Murder Case, Holds Confessions and Shoddy Investigation Insufficient

Case Snapshot

• Case Name: Kondapaka Sridhar @ Shekar v. State of Telangana

• Citation: 2026 INSC 951 (Non-Reportable)

• Bench: Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Justice K. Vinod Chandran

• Date of Judgment: September 3, 2026

• Area of Law: Criminal Law, Circumstantial Evidence, Electronic Evidence, Confessions, Section 65B Evidence Act

The Judgment in One Line

Supreme Court acquits accused in kidnapping-murder case, holding prosecution failed to prove any circumstance beyond doubt, relying solely on inadmissible confessions.

Why This Judgment Matters

This judgment is a stark reminder of the dangers of relying on confessions and shoddy investigation in criminal trials. It emphasizes that convictions cannot be sustained on the basis of confessions alone, especially where no substantive evidence connects the accused to the crime. The ruling also reinforces the strict requirements for proving electronic evidence under Section 65B of the Evidence Act. The Court's detailed critique of the investigation highlights the need for proper collection and proof of evidence, including CCTV footage, call records, and witness testimony.

Background

A person went missing, and his father received a ransom call demanding Rs. 2,00,000/-. The father deposited Rs. 1,50,000/- in an account. Investigation, primarily based on call records, led to the arrest of A6, who purportedly pointed out a flat where the deceased's body was found in a refrigerator. Six accused were charged with kidnapping and murder. A4 died during trial. The Trial Court convicted A1, A

... Upgrade to a Premium Plan to view the full judgment.