top of page

Summary and Analysis of Rajni vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr. (Criminal Appeal Nos. 603/2025 & 2569/2025)

Case Details:-

  • Supreme Court of India (Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction)

  • Proceedings Date: May 23, 2025

Case Background

  1. Appellant: Rajni

  2. Respondents: State of Uttar Pradesh & Another

  3. Nature of Proceedings: Correction of typographical errors in a prior judgment dated May 20, 2025.

Key Issue

  • Rectification of clerical errors in paragraphs 27 and 29 of the judgment, where:
    *"Miscellaneous Case No. 9/2020 in respect of Crime Case No. 11/2020"* was erroneously recorded as *"Miscellaneous Case No. 9/2000 in respect of Crime Case No. 11/2000"*.

Court’s Order

  1. Direction: The Registry was ordered to correct the typographical errors and update the judgment accordingly.

  2. Purpose: Ensure accuracy in legal records to prevent procedural ambiguities.

Legal Significance

  • Highlights the Supreme Court’s scrutiny over judicial records and commitment to precision in legal documentation.

  • Demonstrates the procedural mechanism for correcting clerical errors under the Supreme Court Rules.

Final Outcome

  • Judgment amended to reflect the correct case numbers (2020 instead of 2000).

  • No impact on the substantive merits of the appeal.

Blog Posts

  • Picture2
  • Telegram
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2026 Lawcurb.in

bottom of page