Supreme Court Upholds High Court Interference in Cooperative Dispute Where Arbitrator Ignored Relevant Documentary Evidence

Case Snapshot

• Case Name: Shri Prakash Narain Sharma (Dead) Through LR v. M/s Burmah Shell Co-operative Housing Society & Ors.

• Citation: 2026 INSC 927

• Bench: Justice Atul S. Chandurkar and Justice (not specified in provided text)

• Date of Judgment: August 31, 2026

• Area of Law: Cooperative Societies Law, Writs (Certiorari), Arbitration, Membership Disputes

The Judgment in One Line

Supreme Court upholds High Court's interference under certiorari jurisdiction where arbitrator ignored documentary evidence, resulting in perverse finding on membership.

Why This Judgment Matters

This judgment clarifies the scope of certiorari jurisdiction under Articles 226/227 in cooperative society disputes. It reaffirms that while writ courts cannot re-appreciate evidence, they can interfere when findings are based on no evidence or are perverse. The ruling also emphasizes that relevant documentary evidence cannot be ignored by arbitrators and tribunals. The judgment serves as a reminder that extraordinary writ jurisdiction remains available to correct jurisdictional errors and patent errors of law in cooperative arbitration awards.

Background

The original claimant claimed membership in a cooperative housing society from 1952 and sought allotment of a plot. The Society contended that the claimant had resigned in 1951 and was never readmitted. A dispute was referred to arbitration under Section 61 of the Delhi Cooperative Societies Act, 1972. The Arbitrator upheld the claimant's case and directed plot allotment. The Tribu

... Upgrade to a Premium Plan to view the full judgment.