Case Synopsis

Case: The Karnataka Lokayuktha vs Chandrashekar & Anr., (2026) INSC 31.

Synopsis : This judgment authoritatively delineates the independence of disciplinary and criminal proceedings. It holds that an employee's exoneration in a departmental enquiry, particularly one not founded on a conclusive merits-based clearance, does not ipso facto justify quashing a parallel criminal prosecution, as the two operate in separate spheres with distinct standards of proof and prosecuting entities.

1. Heading of the Judgment

Case Name: The Karnataka Lokayuktha vs Chandrashekar & Anr.
Citation: 2026 INSC 31 (Criminal Appeal No. of 2026 @ SLP(Crl.) No. 13057 of 2025)
Court: Supreme Court of India
Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice K. Vinod Chandran and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah
Date of Judgment: January 06, 2026

2. Related Laws and Sections

The judgment examines the interplay between two distinct legal processes:

• Departmental Disciplinary Proceedings: Governed by service rules and regulations (e.g., Karnataka Electricity Transmission Corporation Limited Regulations). The standard of proof is the preponderance of probabilities.

• Criminal Prosecution: Governed by the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and substantive penal laws (e.g., Prevention of Corruption Act). The standard of proof i

... Upgrade to a Premium Plan to view the full judgment.