top of page

Legal Review and Analysis of The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd vs Durg Roadways Private Limited & Ors 2026 INSC 722

Insurance Coverage for Vehicles with Permits Extends to Foreign Territories Despite Geographical Clause


Case Snapshot

  • Case Name: The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Durg Roadways Private Limited & Ors.

  • Citation: 2026 INSC 722

  • Bench: Justice Sanjay Karol and Justice Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh

  • Date of Judgment: July 20, 2026

  • Area of Law: Motor Accident Claims, Insurance Law, Motor Vehicles Act


Judgment in Brief

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal of the insurer and held that the insurance policy covered an accident that occurred in Nepal, even though the policy specified "Geographical Area: India." The Court ruled that the "Limitation as to Use" clause, which stated that the policy covers use only under a "permit" within the meaning of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, overrode the geographical restriction. Since the vehicle had a valid special permit issued under Section 88(8) of the MVA that expressly authorized travel to Nepal, the insurer was liable. The Court further held that Section 147(5) of the MVA, which contains a non-obstante clause, overrides regulations like the India Motor Tariff requiring additional premium for foreign travel. The driver's valid Indian driving license was recognized in Nepal under the Treaty of Peace and Friendship between India and Nepal. The Court also issued suggestions to IRDAI for standardizing cross-border insurance clauses.


Relevant Facts

  • The offending bus was registered in India and had a valid special permit issued under Section 88(8) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, authorizing travel from Durg to Nepal and back.

  • The vehicle was insured by the appellant-insurer under a policy with "Geographical Area: India" and "Limitation as to Use: The Policy covers use only under a permit within the meaning of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988."

  • The accident occurred in Nepal while the vehicle was on its return journey. Three persons died, including the driver.

  • The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal held the owner liable, not the insurer, because the accident occurred outside India and additional premium for foreign travel was not paid.


... Upgrade to a Premium Plan to view the full judgment.

🔒 Premium Legal Resource

This is a 20% curated summary of the judgment. Gain unrestricted access to our full database of expert case analyses, core legal frameworks, and downloadable analytical PDFs by upgrading to a Lawcurb membership. Join our legal network to unlock this entire record.
  • Picture2
  • Telegram
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2026 Lawcurb.in

bottom of page