top of page

Summary and Analysis of Vijay Krishnaswami @ Krishnaswami Vijayakumar vs Deputy Director of Income Tax (Investigation) 2025 INSC 1048

1. Heading of the Judgment

Supreme Court Quashes Prosecution for Tax Evasion Due to Non-Compliance with Departmental Guidelines and Conclusive Settlement Order.

2. Related Laws and Sections

The judgment extensively discusses the following provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961:

  • Section 276C(1): Deals with the offence of wilful attempt to evade tax, penalty, or interest. It is a criminal provision.

  • Section 279(1): Mandates that prosecution for offences like under Section 276C can only be initiated with the previous sanction of a high-ranking income tax authority (like a Principal Director of Income Tax - PDIT).

  • Chapter XIX-A (Sections 245A to 245L): Pertains to the 'Settlement of Cases'.
    Section 245C: Allows an assessee to make an application to the Income Tax Settlement Commission.
    Section 245D(4): Empowers the Settlement Commission to pass a final order on the application.
    Section 245H: Grants the Settlement Commission the power


... Upgrade to a Premium Plan to view the full judgment.

🔒 Premium Legal Resource

This is a 20% curated summary of the judgment. Gain unrestricted access to our full database of expert case analyses, core legal frameworks, and downloadable analytical PDFs by upgrading to a Lawcurb membership. Join our legal network to unlock this entire record.
  • Picture2
  • Telegram
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2026 Lawcurb.in

bottom of page