top of page
Question Bank
Question
Explain the nature of offenses under Sections 409, 420, 467, 468, 471, and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). What distinguishes these sections in the context of financial fraud?
Solution
The mentioned sections of the IPC pertain to serious economic and white-collar crimes. Section 409 deals with criminal breach of trust by a public servant, banker, merchant, or agent, involving entrustment of property and its dishonest misappropriation. Section 420 covers cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property. Sections 467 and 468 relate to forgery—Section 467 is for forgery of valuable security, will, or authority to make money, while Section 468 is for forgery for the purpose of cheating. Section 471 makes using a forged document as genuine an offense. Crucially, Section 120-B defines the offense of criminal conspiracy, which is an agreement between two or more persons to commit an illegal act or a legal act by illegal means. In financial fraud cases, these sections are often invoked together, with 120-B being pivotal to establish a collaborative scheme to defraud, amplifying the gravity of the individual acts of breach of trust, cheating, and forgery.
Question
What is the objective of the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (in Financial Establishments) Act, 1999 (MPID Act)? How does it empower the state in cases involving financial establishments?
Solution
The Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (MPID Act), 1999 is a special legislation enacted to combat fraud by financial establishments and protect the interests of depositors. Its primary objective is to provide a speedy and effective mechanism for the attachment and confiscation of properties acquired by such establishments through illicit means. The Act empowers the state government to take stringent actions, including attachment of accused persons' properties, to secure and eventually redistribute assets to compensate defrauded depositors. It operates alongside the IPC, allowing for prosecution under both laws, thereby creating a stronger legal framework to address large-scale financial scams that affect a vast number of common depositors.
Question
What are the key parameters and considerations a court must evaluate when deciding an application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC)?
Solution
Granting bail under Section 439 of the CrPC is a discretionary power of the High Court or Sessions Court, which must be exercised judiciously and not arbitrarily. The key parameters, as established by judicial precedents, include: (i) the nature and gravity of the accusation; (ii) the severity of the punishment if convicted; (iii) the prima facie evidence against the accused; (iv) the position and standing of the accused; (v) the likelihood of the accused absconding or fleeing justice; (vi) the possibility of the accused tampering with evidence or influencing witnesses; (vii) the risk of the offense being repeated; and (viii) the larger interests of justice and society. In economic offenses involving large public funds, courts are generally more cautious, as the potential for witness intimidation and dissipation of attached assets is high.
Question
Under what circumstances can a bail order be cancelled by a superior court? What constitutes a "perverse" or "illegal" bail order?
Solution
Bail once granted is not cancelled mechanically. However, a superior or appellate court can cancel bail if it finds the granting order to be perverse, illegal, or based on irrelevant material. Grounds for cancellation include: (i) the occurrence of supervening circumstances after bail was granted (e.g., the accused threatening witnesses); (ii) conduct of the accused demonstrating abuse of liberty; (iii) attempts to delay the trial or obstruct justice; and (iv) if the lower court ignored vital material or misapplied the settled principles governing bail. A "perverse" order is one which is irrational or contrary to the evidence on record, while an "illegal" order fails to comply with statutory mandates or binding legal precedents.
Question
In the investigation of economic offenses, what is the significance of a Forensic Audit Report? How does it aid in establishing a money trail?
Solution
A Forensic Audit Report is a critical tool in unraveling complex financial frauds. It involves a specialized examination of financial records to detect discrepancies, irregularities, and evidence of misappropriation. Its significance lies in its ability to scientifically reconstruct the money trail—the path of funds from their source to their ultimate use. The report analyzes bank statements, cash books, vouchers, and property transactions to identify unexplained credits, suspicious cash withdrawals, and investments in immovable properties that do not match declared income. This helps investigators and courts establish a prima facie case of siphoning of funds, especially when books of accounts are manipulated. It provides objective, documentary corroboration to witness statements, making it harder for accused persons to dispute their involvement in the scam.
bottom of page