top of page
Question Bank
Question
Explain the significance of Sections 427 (Mischief), 452 (House-trespass after preparation for hurt, assault, or wrongful restraint), and 467 (Forgery of valuable security) of the IPC in the context of property-related conflicts. Highlight the essential elements that distinguish these offenses?
Solution
Sections 427, 452, and 467 of the IPC address distinct facets of property crimes. Section 427 penalizes mischief causing damage (exceeding ₹50), requiring intentional destruction or diminution of property value. Section 452 criminalizes trespass into a dwelling with intent to commit an offense involving assault, hurt, or wrongful restraint, emphasizing the invasion of privacy and security. Section 467 deals with aggravated forgery of documents conferring legal rights (e.g., deeds, wills), targeting falsification that undermines property ownership or financial integrity. These sections collectively combat physical damage, unlawful intrusion, and fraudulent title manipulation in property disputes.
Question
Describe the doctrine that "anticipatory bail is an extraordinary remedy" in Indian criminal law. What key considerations (e.g., gravity of offense, custodial investigation) should courts evaluate before granting such relief?
Solution
The principle that anticipatory bail is an extraordinary remedy stems from judicial recognition that it is not a routine entitlement. Courts must exercise cautious discretion based on:
Gravity of the allegations (e.g., violent trespass, forgery, witness intimidation);
Need for custodial investigation to uncover evidence or prevent tampering;
Criminal antecedents of the accused;
Material concealment or misrepresentation by the applicant; and
Risk of miscarriage of justice if interim protection impedes the probe. This exceptional relief balances individual liberty against societal interest in thorough investigation.
Question
Under what circumstances can anticipatory bail be cancelled? Discuss specific violations (e.g., witness intimidation, non-cooperation) that warrant revocation?
Solution
Anticipatory bail can be cancelled if the accused:
Violates bail conditions (e.g., intimidating witnesses or tampering with evidence);
Fails to cooperate with investigators, making police custody necessary;
Engages in subsequent criminal conduct; or
Obtains bail through suppression of material facts (e.g., hiding prior court orders). Crucially, threatening witnesses or flouting investigation protocols demonstrates abuse of liberty, justifying cancellation to uphold judicial integrity and ensure a fair trial.
Question
Explain the legal significance of Sections 120-B (criminal conspiracy) and 34 (common intention) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) in cases involving multiple accused. How do these provisions establish collective responsibility for property-related offenses?
Solution
Sections 120-B and 34 IPC address shared criminal liability among co-accused. Section 120-B penalizes agreement between two or more persons to commit an offense, requiring proof of a conspiratorial meeting of minds. Section 34 imposes joint liability when a criminal act is done by multiple persons in furtherance of a common intention. For property crimes (e.g., trespass, forgery), these sections ensure all participants—including instigators and accomplices—are held liable even if roles differ. Key distinctions:
120-B focuses on pre-planning (e.g., scheming to forge documents);
34 applies to spontaneous collaboration during offense execution (e.g., jointly vandalizing property).
Question
How can ex parte injunctions in civil cases lead to criminal liability if misused? Discuss the legal recourse (e.g., setting aside orders, criminal charges) available against fraudulent procurement of such interim relief?
Solution
An ex parte injunction (interim relief granted without hearing the opponent) becomes criminally actionable if obtained via:
Material concealment (e.g., hiding property ownership facts);
Fraudulent documentation (e.g., forged power of attorney);
Misrepresentation to the court.
Legal remedies include:
Setting aside the injunction through appellate review (e.g., civil misc. appeal);
Criminal prosecution under Sections 420 (cheating), 467 (forgery), and 471 (using forged documents) of the IPC for deceitfully influencing judicial outcomes. Courts may also impose costs or initiate contempt proceedings for abuse of process.
bottom of page