top of page
Question Bank
Question
Explain the scope of an advocate's professional misconduct, highlighting what actions, beyond mere moral turpitude, can constitute such misconduct?
Solution
The term professional misconduct is not exhaustively defined but is interpreted widely within the legal profession. It encompasses any act or omission by an advocate that interrupts or misdirects the flow of justice. This includes betraying the confidence of a client, which is considered a grave form of misconduct. Even more serious is any deliberate attempt at misleading the court or practising deception or fraud on the court. The standard is what would be "reasonably regarded as disgraceful or dishonourable" by professional brethren of good repute. It is not limited to actions involving moral turpitude; it is a contextual term judged by the advocate's duties to the client, the opponent, the court, the society, and to themselves. A key aspect is the sacred trust between the court and the counsel, which is fundamental to the administration of justice.
Question
What are the powers of the Bar Council of India under Section 37 of the Advocates Act, 1961 when hearing an appeal against a State Bar Council's disciplinary order, and what crucial procedural safeguard must be observed?
Solution
Under Section 37 of the Advocates Act, 1961, the Disciplinary Committee of the Bar Council of India possesses very wide appellate jurisdiction. It has the power to confirm, vary, or reverse the order of the State Bar Council. Crucially, this power to vary includes the authority to enhance the punishment imposed on the advocate. However, a vital procedural safeguard is embedded in the proviso to this section. If the Bar Council of India intends to vary the order to prejudicially affect the aggrieved person, it must provide them with a reasonable opportunity of being heard. This means if enhancement of punishment is proposed, a specific notice must be issued, and the advocate must be given a chance to show cause against it, embodying the principles of natural justice and fair hearing.
Question
Discuss the legal requirements for a valid compromise of a suit under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), particularly focusing on the court's role and satisfaction?
Solution
Order XXIII Rule 3 of the CPC governs the compromise of a suit. It mandates that for a suit to be adjusted wholly or in part, there must be a lawful agreement or compromise that is in writing and signed by the parties. The central requirement is that this agreement must be proved to the satisfaction of the Court. The court's role is not merely administrative; it must be actively satisfied that the compromise is both genuine and voluntarily entered into by the parties. To achieve this satisfaction, the court has the inherent power to insist on the personal appearance of the parties before it, especially if it entertains any doubt about the authenticity of the compromise. The phrase "proved to the satisfaction of the Court" is the cornerstone of this rule, ensuring the decree passed is based on a legitimate and voluntary settlement.
Question
What is the legal position regarding an advocate's authority to compromise a case on behalf of a client, and how does it interact with the specific requirements of Order XXIII Rule 3, CPC?
Solution
An advocate engaged in the thick of court proceedings possesses an implied authority to compromise or settle matters on behalf of their client. This principle, upheld by superior courts, remains valid even after the 1976 amendment to Order XXIII Rule 3, CPC, which explicitly requires the agreement to be "in writing and signed by the parties." However, this implied authority of the counsel does not dilute the court's fundamental obligation to be satisfied about the factum and genuineness of the compromise. The advocate's authority is a facet of the client's representation, but the court's duty to verify the reality of the agreement is paramount. Therefore, if the court has reasons to doubt whether the client has, as a matter of fact, consented, it is fully within its rights to direct the personal presence of the party for verification, overriding the advocate's implied authority.
Question
Explain the legal conclusiveness of a court's recorded proceedings and the procedure for challenging their accuracy?
Solution
The record of the proceedings made by a court is considered sacrosanct and conclusive. The statements of fact regarding what was done, said, or admitted in court, as recorded in the judge's order sheet or judgment, are deemed to be the definitive account of events. This record cannot be contradicted merely by statements at the Bar, by affidavit, or by any other external evidence. If a party believes that the court's record is inaccurate, the only permissible course is to promptly bring this to the attention of the very same judge who made the record, while the matter is still fresh, and seek its rectification. Failure to take this specific step at the earliest opportunity forecloses the possibility of challenging the correctness of the recorded proceedings at a later stage, as the court's record must be accepted as the final word on what transpired before it.
bottom of page